Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 04:15

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What’s next?
Why Disney’s AI Lawsuit Will Determine Whether Studios Survive - The Hollywood Reporter
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Here's Where Traders Expect Broadcom Stock to Go After Earnings - Investopedia
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Is crossdressing being a transvestite?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
The BEST exercise for heart health, according to top US cardiac surgeon - Times of India
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Pokemon Scarlet And Violet's Free Switch 2 Update Is Now Live - GameSpot
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.